Home
This section applies to the personal information of Users in Japan and supplements the other sections of Mistplay’s Global Privacy Policy, which continue to apply.
We may jointly use collected personal data subject to the following conditions.
Personal data items to be used jointly
Items as stated in 1. INFORMATION WE COLLECT ABOUT YOU of Mistplay’s Global Privacy Policy.
Purpose of joint use
Purposes as stated in 2. USE OF PERSONAL DATA of Mistplay’s Global Privacy Policy.
Scope of joint users
Mistplay subsidiaries or affiliates under common corporate control with us, including Mistplay USA, located in Canada and USA.
Person responsible for managing personal data for joint use
Name of person responsible: Mistplay Inc.
Address: Suite 200 - 1001 Blvd Robert-Bourassa, Montréal, QC H3B 0A7
Name of representative: Jason Heller, CEO
For the purposes stipulated in 2. Use of personal data of Mistplay’s Global Privacy Policy, the personal data we collect may be mainly handled in the USA and Canada, and to the extent that the applicable law allows, we may transfer our collected personal data to third parties located in the countries below. The links below provide details of the data protection systems in these countries provided by the Japan Personal Information Protection Commission (“PPC”).
Country/areas of the recipient third party
Summary of Personal information protection system in the country/area
Member state of the European Economic Area including Czech Republic
Member state of the European Economic Area (EEA) which has a data protection system that Japan recognizes as equivalent to that of Japan. Click here for further details.
Canada
Country recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection among private sectors, and participating in the APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (“CBPR”) System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
USA
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, but participating in the APEC CBPR System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
UK
Country has a data protection system that Japan recognized as equivalent to that of Japan and is recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection. Click here for further details.
Australia
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, but participates in the APEC CBPR System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
New Zealand
Country recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection among private sectors, but not participating in the APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (“CBPR”) System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
South Korea
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, but participates in the APEC CBPR System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
India
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, nor participating in the APEC CBPR System. However, no rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. The Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011 (collectively, “Laws”) set out at least some of the obligations of business operators, etc. or the rights of the individuals corresponding to the eight (8) principles of the OECD Privacy Guidelines. In particular, while no relevant provisions relating to the accountability principle could be found, the other seven principle of the OECD Guidelines are at least partially reflected in the Laws. Click here for further details.
Additionally, to the extent required by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (“APPI”), we will put in place appropriate and reasonable measures to protect your personal data with such third parties receiving the personal data and thus ensure that such third parties will implement the measures with an adequate level required for business operators handing personal information under the APPI.
This section applies to the personal information of Users in Japan and supplements the other sections of Mistplay’s Global Privacy Policy, which continue to apply.
We may jointly use collected personal data subject to the following conditions.
Personal data items to be used jointly
Items as stated in 1. INFORMATION WE COLLECT ABOUT YOU of Mistplay’s Global Privacy Policy.
Purpose of joint use
Purposes as stated in 2. USE OF PERSONAL DATA of Mistplay’s GlobalPrivacy Policy.
Scope of joint users
Mistplay subsidiaries or affiliates under common corporate control with us, including Mistplay USA, located in Canada and USA.
Person responsible for managing personal data for joint use
Name of person responsible: Mistplay Inc.
Address: 481 Ave VigerWest, Suite 300
Montreal (QC) H2Z 1G6, Canada
Name of representative: Jason Heller, CEO
For the purposes stipulated in 2. Use of personal data of Mistplay’s Global Privacy Policy, the personal data we collect may be mainly handled in the USA and Canada, and to the extent that the applicable law allows, we may transfer our collected personal data to third parties located in the countries below. The links below provide details of the data protection systems in these countries provided by the Japan Personal Information Protection Commission (“PPC”).
Country/areas of the recipient third party
Summary of Personal information protection system in the country/area
Member state of the European Economic Area including Czech Republic
Member state of the European Economic Area (EEA)which has a data protection system that Japan recognizes as equivalent to that ofJapan. Click here for further details.
Canada
Country recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection among private sectors, and participating in the APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (“CBPR”) System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
USA
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, but participating in the APEC CBPR System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
UK
Country has a data protection system that Japan recognized as equivalent to that of Japan and is recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection. Click here for further details.
Australia
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, but participates in the APEC CBPR System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
New Zealand
Country recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection among private sectors, but not participating in the APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (“CBPR”) System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
South Korea
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, but participates in the APEC CBPR System. No rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. Click here for further details.
India
Country not recognized by the European Commission as offering an adequate level of data protection, nor participating in the APEC CBPR System. However, no rules that may seriously impact individuals’ rights or interest have been found. The Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011 (collectively, “Laws”) set out at least some of the obligations of business operators, etc. or the rights of the individuals corresponding to the eight (8) principles of the OECD Privacy Guidelines. In particular, while no relevant provisions relating to the accountability principle could be found, the other seven principle of the OECD Guidelines are at least partially reflected in the Laws. Click here for further details.
Additionally, to the extent required by the Act on the Protection ofPersonal Information (“APPI”), we will put in place appropriate and reasonablemeasures to protect your personal data with such third parties receiving the personal data and thus ensure that such third parties will implement themeasures with an adequate level required for business operators handing personal information under the APPI.